Originally posted by Ron
Maybe it's just me, but considering the effort we go to to try to keep a 10:1 safety margin in our climbing system, it seems binocular inspection and bounce testing is not in line with a 10:1 safety margin concept.
Bingo!You purchase the finest equipment.
You adhere to every ANSI standard.
You follow all the rules.
But. . .
The one part of your climbing equipment that does
NOT have any rating or comply to
any safety standard is the tree! You can climb on 8100# Arbormaster and use the finest carabineers money can buy but the rating of the tree is always a guess. To be fair, I must say that the safety record of recreational tree climbing is very good, but it’s normal to be uneasy on rope until you get to “know” the tree your climbing in.
By Ron
But, again, due to lack of experience, fear, or whatever, I am very reluctant to do this on a pine limb. Tying the rope to the _base_ of the tree puts double my weight on the limb the rope is across.
Ron, I agree with both of your above points.
As compared to a healthy, mature, deciduous hardwood, why would you even bother with a pine? Then again, I guess we climb on what’s available, and if I was in tall pine country, I’d be foolish not conquer the pines. No?
Anyway, pine tree climbing is indeed a different sport than bouncing around in your typical oak or maple canopy (Me, stating this as a fellow novice of course).
Your statement about going single line and doubling your weight on the branch fits the “safety” dialogue perfectly! If your a tad uneasy doing DRT on a new, untested tree,
using a tie in point that unfortunately has not been stamped with an ANSI rating, then you best be doubly worried if you single-line it and expose the limb to double the weight.
(Shows an understanding of good neophyte survival skills!)

By the way, what part of the country will you be climbing in?
Regards,
-Ej-