True confessions of a rope abuser (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Favoured: 0
|
|
|
TOPIC: True confessions of a rope abuser
|
|
|
|
4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
|
hi robert, i climb ddrt with a petzl shunt in place of a friction hitch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
jimk123 (User)
Gold Boarder
Posts: 278
|
|
Source of Quotation 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
The purpose of this entry is to reference the source of the quote attributed to this author. Actually the quote is from TCI. The context of the quote is being provided, since this is becoming part of the discussion. http://www.treeclimbing.com/treegear.html Tree-climbing rope, or arborist rope, uses a polyester-Dacron exterior sheath instead of the nylon sheathes found on rock-climbing ropes. Unlike nylon, polyester has a high heat tolerance. It is also soft and pliable, making it easy to tie the special knots needed to climb trees safely. The rope is built in a braided construction. Never use a twist-constructed rope. It will make you spin in the air while you hang suspended! Rock-climbing ropes are not suitable for tree climbing unless you are using static ropes with mechanical ascenders. Rock climbers use dynamic ropes with designed elasticity to take falls (shock loads); these are not appropriate for tree climbing, because they have too much stretch. The main technique used by tree climbers, double rope technique, requires the rope to run over a branch (or a friction saving device if needed) while fully loaded with body weight. If you were to use one of those pretty mountain-climbing ropes (kermantle), you'd melt the thin outside sheath on the first climb! Not good!
This comment by TCI is well supported by a survey of rope recommendations and rope manufacturers. Additionally, it's consistent with the polymeric chemistry that defines nylon as the weaker filament for abraision and heat resistance when compared to polyester. If wet, the nylon performance worsens. It's factual that polyester is preferred. How quickly nylon will degrade is a matter of the conditions. Of course wet weather presents the worse case scenario. "On Rope" Pagett 3rd edition page 21 presents how nylon strength varies between wet and dry in the section _title_d Abrasion Resistance. Pagett also presents a diagram showing a nylon rope being tested under the worse scenario - wet. Obviously this isn't a concern with polyester. There's a lot of merit to the TCI quote. The general public is just becoming aware that the manufacturer's quotation of melt point correlates with rope properties, but it fails to define those properties. The Tg better defines rope properties because it directly measures the flex of the fiber over the application temperature range. Lastly the technical literature reports nylon does indeed have the lower Tg, lower abraision resistance, and a severe reduction in strength when wet. Regards, JimK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regards, Jim Tree Climber's Toast: may we climb a 100 year old oak tree together, and may we plant that tree tomorrow.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
|
robert, the sheath is intact and the rope works well. As a climbing arborist this rope is used on nearly a daily basis, wouldn't like to say how many climbs its done but probably in the region of 200. I am aware of the arguement regarding mountaineering rope and read up on this before i decided to switch. As i use a shunt as a friction hitch there is not much heat build up at all, specially if you descend at a reasonable speed. If i want to whizz down a rope i simply change to single and stick on a figure of 8. Also i anchor my rope with a cambium saver with a pulley attached. So long as you do your best to avoid crossing branches etc, there really is very little friction at all using this method. I have no qualms with recommending the system. hope this is interesting for you, I certainly wouldn't knock it before you try it. Also, something which is quite cool with this dynamic setup, on long pulls sometimes you can get a little bounce going on the rope which actually shoots the shunt up the rope twice as far. By the way, the shunt is self advancing unlike a friction hitch, is used more like a lockjack
cheers steve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
SRT-Tech (Visitor)
Gold Boarder
Posts: 242
|
|
1 Year, 7 Months ago
|
|
|
Originally posted by stevebullman robert, the sheath is intact and the rope works well. As a climbing arborist this rope is used on nearly a daily basis, wouldn't like to say how many climbs its done but probably in the region of 200. I am aware of the arguement regarding mountaineering rope and read up on this before i decided to switch. As i use a shunt as a friction hitch there is not much heat build up at all, specially if you descend at a reasonable speed. If i want to whizz down a rope i simply change to single and stick on a figure of 8. Also i anchor my rope with a cambium saver with a pulley attached. So long as you do your best to avoid crossing branches etc, there really is very little friction at all using this method. I have no qualms with recommending the system. hope this is interesting for you, I certainly wouldn't knock it before you try it. Also, something which is quite cool with this dynamic setup, on long pulls sometimes you can get a little bounce going on the rope which actually shoots the shunt up the rope twice as far. By the way, the shunt is self advancing unlike a friction hitch, is used more like a lockjack
cheers steve
hear hear!!! i too use this setup (yes i also use arborist ropes too....) and quite like it. Ascents are FAST, descents are controlled and safe, and i have yet to see a SINGLE mm of glazing on my BW Assualtline.
but for the genreal public just getting into it, i always recomend using polyester rtopes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
ron (User)
Senior Boarder
Posts: 48
|
|
1 Year, 2 Months ago
|
|
|
It seems to be increasingly difficult to find temperatrue ratings of nylon and polyester rope from manufacturers. The one place I could find temperature specs was Yale Cordage. They say:
Temperature: Effect on tensile strength. The tensile strength charts apply to ropes tested at normal room temperature (70°F). Ropes have lower tensile strengths at higher temperatures 30% (or more) lower at the boiling point of water (212°F) and continuing on down to zero strengths for nylon and polyester at 480°F and 300°F for polypropylene. Also continued exposure at elevated temperatures can melt and part synthetic ropes or cause permanent damage.
I couldn't find those "tensile strength charts " they refer to, but the implication of the statement is that nylon and polyester have essentially the same temperature characteristics.
I have seen at least two other references that corroborate that nylon and polyester ropes have very nearly the same temperature characteristics and as it so often goes, now I can't remember where I found them.
As for abrasion resistance, 'cave' ropes are nylon over nylon and are designed to work in very abrasive conditions.
In their catalog, PMI says this about their nylon core/nylon sheath rope:
"No other 11mm rope will outlast a PMI Classic in side by side, real world applications!"
I believe the primary reasons for using polyester as arborists ropes are because it has a bit less stretch, and it's simply more flexible to accomodate tying friction knots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
oldtimer (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 523
|
|
Rope Abusers? 1 Year, 2 Months ago
|
|
|
What got this old post revisited? Are you guys melting ropes by high speed descends again? Cool it! Slow down and enjoy the climb. It is not a race, it's an adventure and it's just for fun!
Let the professional Arborists smoke their ropes. They do it for living and can replace their climbing gear regularly as part of doing business. Remember: Low and slooooow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oldtimer, Tree Climbing In Austin
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
The birch, most shy and ladylike of trees. --James Russell Lowell, "An Indian-Summer Reverie"
|
|
|