Dissecting your post. . .3CLIMBER said: I hope this post doesn't seem weird...I Say: Off-topic threads are a great way to give things like “rope, saddles, & ascenders” a rest. It’s not weird, it’s inspiring!
3CLIMBER comments: Living near trees makes it easier to climb them.Absolutely! Having to drive an hour or more to get to heavily wooded areas so you can climb is a pain! (Trust me, I know)
3CLIMBER asks: Do the tall trees hold as much appeal when a person gets older? Or, are the friendly, but shorter trees just as much fun?My view: Extremely tall trees are good for the “challenge” and are also a good justification for SRT but, (i.m.h.o.) the real party begins in a nice fat canopy. A short fat tree with an expansive canopy is like a carnival. It can easily entertain several climbers at once. It’s a haven for treeboating. It always seems to need a bit of pruning or maintenance, (which will give you a sense of personal connection with the tree).
And as for (old) age and climbing. . .
I’m 50 and consider myself quite “beat-up” from a less than intelligent life_style_ in the past. Regardless, I have been on a number of group-climbs and
in spite of the fact that my throw-bag skills are crap and my overall stamina is mediocre, I have always had a great time.
Common sense: Day-trips are always a safe bet. However, week long wilderness adventures with pro-climbers in big-timber country may be bit much unless you are at their skill level. Ask the group leader, he’ll tell you what to expect before you sign-on.
All I need at retirement is a small chunk of property with a few mature Beech, Red Maple, a Sycamore, anything will do!
See You There,
Ol’man Ej 