cambium wrote:...Thanks for the info concerning the Butterfly II. Just looking at the way the NT saddles cradle the back of the leg does suggest they would be far more comfortable on that part of the body. I wonder if they (NT) have considered making a rope bridge saddle.The design of the NT harness doesn't lend itself to a floating anchor bridge. It would have to be a total redesign. The NT as is doesn't need an anchor bridge, there is enough movement in the legstrap/belt loop system to let you change positions and do what you need to do in a tree. The floating anchor bridge system evolved to allow for reaching out on the end of limb walks to prune outer branches. It's a specialized evolution of harness design for the specific needs of daily work climbers.
Generally speaking arborist work climbers spend more time standing directly on the tree because of the nature of their work. They have to be in close proximity to limbs they are cutting. The harnesses they use are not designed for long hang times. Work climbers get in and out of the tree as quickly as possible, time is money. When you're rec climbing try spending more than 5-10 minutes standing on a branch. Your legs will start shaking. It's very tiring to put your weight on one leg or the other or both for any length of time in a tree. When you put your weight on the rope and harness you can rest your legs, it's the key to being able to stay in the tree continuously for 3 or more hours. This is common for rec climbers, I barely consider it a climb if I don't go over 3 hours. Pro climbers have the skills to move very quickly in the tree, resetting TIPs etc. This kind of movement in the tree takes years of daily climbing to achieve. For rec climbers it's going to take longer to acquire new tie-ins and work your way around the tree. You have to be able to sit and rest while you work on your next move.
Rec climbing is a really different way of being in a tree than work climbing and I think the gear and technique is going to be a little different. For instance I don't personally know one work climber who uses a sleeve or pipe _style_ cambium saver and I've climbed with a good number. It's either no cambium protection, ring-ring type saver or ropeguide (ART) _style_ false crotch. These approaches fit the arborist climbing _style_. They can be used for rec climbing but they are designed/evolved for the specific needs of work climbers. It's not a great idea for a rec climber to blindly model their gear and technique after work climbers, unless there is a specific reason _base_d on climbing experience to do so.
The BII harness is an example of an excellent work harness. It's not a great rec harness, unless you're an arborist making a weekend rec climb

I've done a fair amount of trimming work in NT harnesses, they are very functional for doing tree work when you need to do it.
This is not an ad for NT harnesses, many rec climbers use non-NT harnesses. I wrote this excessively long rambling post because I think if you're a beginner rec climber it's really important not to _base_ your gear and technique decisions on the latest work climbing gear and _style_. Start simple and learn how to be in a tree. Spend many hours climbing, rope and harness. You don't need the latest and most expensive to learn the most important skills of climbing. I often climb in an NT Basic harness. It's a great harness, doesn't need all the bells and whistles, plus it's light, folds up small and doesn't cost much. Then when you decide you want more features you'll be able to make an informed decision on which direction to go. Your NT Basic will always be there for a quick woods climb or it will make a great second harness to bring a friend up.
-moss